L'objet de cette annonce a été vendu le sam. 27 avr. à 10:58.

Photo 1 sur 7

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO HSM EX DG OS Lens For Nikon W/ UV FILTER - Photo 2 sur 7

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO HSM EX DG OS Lens For Nikon W/ UV FILTER - Photo 3 sur 7

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO HSM EX DG OS Lens For Nikon W/ UV FILTER - Photo 4 sur 7

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO HSM EX DG OS Lens For Nikon W/ UV FILTER - Photo 5 sur 7

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO HSM EX DG OS Lens For Nikon W/ UV FILTER - Photo 6 sur 7

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO HSM EX DG OS Lens For Nikon W/ UV FILTER - Photo 7 sur 7

VENDU

Vous en avez un à vendre?

Vendez le vôtre

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO HSM EX DG OS Lens For Nikon W/ UV FILTER

Name: Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO HSM EX DG OS Lens For Nikon W/ UV FILTER
Brand: Sigma
Price: 833.44 CAD
Availability: OutOfStock

État :

D'occasion

Prix de vente :

610,00 $US

Environ833,44 $C

Expédition :

14,35 $US (environ 19,61 $C) Expédition accélérée. En savoir plussur l'expédition

Lieu : Indianapolis, Indiana, États-Unis

Livraison :

Livraison prévue entre le ven. 28 juin et le mer. 3 juil. à 43230

Renvois :

Renvois refusés. En savoir plus- pour en savoir plus sur les renvois

Paiements :

Magasinez en toute confiance

Garantie de remboursement eBay

Recevez l'objet commandé ou obtenez un remboursement.

En savoir plusGarantie de remboursement eBay - s'ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre ou un nouvel onglet

Informations sur le vendeur

parallellines22 (3356)
100% d'évaluations positives

Inscrit comme vendeur professionnel

Signaler cet objet - s'ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre ou un nouvel onglet

Le vendeur assume l'entière responsabilité de cette annonce.

Numéro de l'objet eBay :325935710467

Caractéristiques de l'objet

État: D'occasion: Un objet ayant été utilisé. L'objet peut présenter certaines traces d'usure, mais il ... D'occasion: Un objet ayant été utilisé. L'objet peut présenter certaines traces d'usure, mais il fonctionne parfaitement. Il peut s'agir d'un article en montre ou d'un objet retourné au détaillant et ayant été utilisé. Veuillez consulter l'annonce pour tous les détails et une description des imperfections. Afficher toutes les définitions d'état(s'ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre ou un nouvel onglet)

Maximum Aperture: f/2.8

Compatible Brand: For Nikon

Mount: Nikon AF

MPN: 589101

Focal Length: 70-200mm

Brand: Sigma

Series: Sigma EX

Type: Telephoto

Compatible Lens Front: 77 mm

Focus Type: Auto

Camera Technology: Digital

Compatible Filter Size: 77 mm

Focal Length Type: Zoom

Description de l'objet du vendeur

Le vendeur assume l'entière responsabilité de cette annonce.

Numéro de l'objet eBay :325935710467

Expédition et manutention

Lieu où se trouve l'objet :

Indianapolis, Indiana, États-Unis

Expédition :

Afghanistan, Afrique du Sud, Albanie, Algérie, Allemagne, Andorre, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Arabie saoudite, Argentine, Arménie, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Azerbaïdjan, Bahamas, Bahreïn, Bangladesh, Belgique, Bermudes, Bhoutan, Bolivie, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Botswana, Brunéi Darussalam, Brésil, Bulgarie, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Bélize, Bénin, Cambodge, Cameroun, Canada, Chili, Chine, Chypre, Colombie, Corée du Sud, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Danemark, Djibouti, Espagne, Estonie, Fidji, Finlande, France, Gabon, République du, Gambie, Ghana, Gibraltar, Grenade, Groenland, Grèce, Guatemala, Guinée, Guinée équatoriale, Guinée-Bissau, Guyana, Géorgie, Haïti, Honduras, Hong Kong, Hongrie, Inde, Indonésie, Irlande, Islande, Israël, Italie, Jamaïque, Japon, Jordanie, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kirghizistan, Kiribati, Koweït, Laos, Lesotho, Lettonie, Liban, Libéria, Liechtenstein, Lituanie, Luxembourg, Macao, Macédoine, Madagascar, Malaisie, Malawi, Maldives, Mali, Malte, Maroc, Mauritanie, Mexique, Moldavie, Monaco, Mongolie, Montserrat, Monténégro, Mozambique, Namibie, Nauru, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norvège, Nouvelle-Zélande, Népal, Oman, Ouganda, Ouzbékistan, Pakistan, Panama, Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée, Paraguay, Pays-Bas, Philippines, Pologne, Portugal, Pérou, Qatar, Roumanie, Royaume-Uni, Rwanda, République centrafricaine, République de Croatie, République dominicaine, République du Congo, République démocratique du Congo, République tchèque, Saint-Kitts-et-Nevis, Saint-Marin, Saint-Vincent-et-les Grenadines, Sainte-Lucie, Salvador, Samoa, Serbie, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapour, Slovaque, Slovénie, Sri Lanka, Suisse, Suriname, Suède, Swaziland, Sénégal, Tadjikistan, Tanzanie, Taïwan, Tchad, Thaïlande, Togo, Tonga, Trinité-et-Tobago, Tunisie, Turkménistan, Turquie, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Wallis-et-Futuna, Zambie, Zimbabwe, Égypte, Émirats arabes unis, Équateur, Érythrée, État de la Cité du Vatican, États-Unis, Éthiopie, Île Maurice, Îles Caïmans, Îles Salomon, Îles Turks et Caicos, Îles du Cap-Vert

Lieux exclus :

Barbade, Guadeloupe, Guyane française, Libye, Martinique, Nouvelle-Calédonie, Polynésie française, Russie, Réunion, Ukraine, Venezuela

Changer de pays :

Code postal :

Expédition et manutention	À	Service	Livraison*Voir les remarques sur la livraison
14,35 $US (environ 19,61 $C)	États-Unis	Expédition accélérée (USPS Priority Mail®)	Livraison prévue entre le ven. 28 juin et le mer. 3 juil. à 43230

*Les dates de livraison approximatives – s'ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre ou un nouvel onglet tiennent compte du délai de manutention du vendeur, du code postal de l'expéditeur, du code postal du destinataire et de l'heure de l'acceptation et dépendent du service d'expédition sélectionné et de la réception du paiement. Les délais de livraison peuvent varier, particulièrement lors de périodes achalandées.Remarques - Livraison *Les dates de livraison approximatives tiennent compte du délai de manutention du vendeur, du code postal de l'expéditeur, du code postal du destinataire et de l'heure de l'acceptation et dépendent du service d'expédition sélectionné et de la réception du paiement. Les délais de livraison peuvent varier, particulièrement lors de périodes achalandées.

Délai de manutention

Expédition dans les 3 jours ouvrables après réception du paiement.

Taxes

Des taxes peuvent s'appliquer à la conclusion de la transaction. En savoir plusEn savoir plus au sujet du paiement de taxes sur les achats eBay.

Taxe de vente pour cet objet (325935710467)

Le vendeur facture une taxe de vente pour les États suivants :

État	Taux de la taxe de vente

*La taxe s'applique uniquement au sous-total + frais d'expédition et de manutention pour les objets dans ces États

Modalités de renvoi

Détails sur les modalités de renvoi
Le vendeur refusera les renvois pour cet objet.

Détails du paiement

Modes de paiement

Parallel Lines

100% d'évaluations positives

7,1K objets vendus

Visiter la Boutique Contacter

Évaluations détaillées du vendeur

Moyenne au cours des 12 derniers mois

Qualité de la description

4.9

Justesse des frais d'expédition

4.7

Rapidité de l'expédition

5.0

Communication

5.0

Catégories populaires de cette Boutique

Tout affichercatégories

Autre

Évaluations comme vendeur (3 279)

Cet objet (1)

Tous les objets (3 279)

m***a (194)- Évaluation laissée par l'acheteur.

Six derniers mois

Achat vérifié

A very positive purchase experience. The seller was very quick to respond to questions and was very helpful.

Afficher toutes les évaluations

Évaluations et avis sur le produit

Rédiger un avis

4.9

49 évaluations du produit

46 utilisateurs ont attribué une note de 5 étoiles sur 5
3 utilisateurs ont attribué une note de 4 étoiles sur 5
0 utilisateurs ont attribué une note de 3 étoiles sur 5
0 utilisateurs ont attribué une note de 2 étoiles sur 5
0 utilisateurs ont attribué une note de 1 étoiles sur 5

Durable

Sharp image

Good value

Avis les plus pertinents

Afficher tous les avis (41)

par skylark7189
déc. 12, 2012
Excellent Build, Excellent Image Quality, great alternative to Canon.
I am a professional wedding photographer, and my Canon 70-200 2.8L IS had pretty much run its course, and I was no longer happy with the image quality. I didn't want to spend over $2000 on a replacement, as I am primarily a prime lens shooter and my 135mm produces images just as sharp as the new Canon 70-200. I started doing research and reading reviews on third party options, and have used Sigma glass before, I found a practically new unit on e-bay for $935.00 and purchased it. I was pleasantly surprised when the lens arrived at my door. The build quality is excellent, and although not weather sealed, feels just as good as the Canon equivalent. Image quality is gorgeous, and sharper then anything my Canon 70-200 produced. For the price, you cannot go wrong with this lens! Focus is fast, ... I am a professional wedding photographer, and my Canon 70-200 2.8L IS had pretty much run its course, and I was no longer happy with the image quality. I didn't want to spend over $2000 on a replacement, as I am primarily a prime lens shooter and my 135mm produces images just as sharp as the new Canon 70-200. I started doing research and reading reviews on third party options, and have used Sigma glass before, I found a practically new unit on e-bay for $935.00 and purchased it. I was pleasantly surprised when the lens arrived at my door. The build quality is excellent, and although not weather sealed, feels just as good as the Canon equivalent. Image quality is gorgeous, and sharper then anything my Canon 70-200 produced. For the price, you cannot go wrong with this lens! Focus is fast, the Optical Stabilization works great, and the black finish looks great with the camera and doesn't stand out as much as the big white lenses. Sharp at 2.8... super sharp at 4., great value!
par choirdude70
juil. 10, 2013
Awesome Lens. Best bang for your buck.
I shoot at a semi-pro level. This was a great lens to add to my bag. It did not break the bank like the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS. I have shot with both lenses side by side. I will say the Image Stabilization on the Canon is better just not 2x the price better. Also, I have noticed some slight chromatic aberration and soft edges with this lens. Nothing I cant fix in post, but its enough for me not to give picture quality a 5 star rating. The lens is heavy, but if it was light, I would be concerned. The build quality is great and feels awesome to hold . I LOVE the tripod ring on this camera. I think it is much more convenient than the Canon counterpart. This lens takes some practice as do most lenses with longer focal point. It is harder to hold and heavier so it can take some practice getting ... I shoot at a semi-pro level. This was a great lens to add to my bag. It did not break the bank like the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS. I have shot with both lenses side by side. I will say the Image Stabilization on the Canon is better just not 2x the price better. Also, I have noticed some slight chromatic aberration and soft edges with this lens. Nothing I cant fix in post, but its enough for me not to give picture quality a 5 star rating. The lens is heavy, but if it was light, I would be concerned. The build quality is great and feels awesome to hold . I LOVE the tripod ring on this camera. I think it is much more convenient than the Canon counterpart. This lens takes some practice as do most lenses with longer focal point. It is harder to hold and heavier so it can take some practice getting used to but so does the Canon in my opinion. I have always enjoyed Sigma lenses and for the digital race, I have not been impressed. There new line of lenses with OS have changed my opinion and I am even thinking of investing in a few others. The biggest downside to this lens is the black and gold color scheme make it look like you are shooting with a Nikon, and who really wants that kind of reputation.
par iguanajm
août 09, 2006
Great lens, forget about the L
I really enjoy this lens. Great bokeh, and decent at limiting the amount of CA. I've compared imagages shot with this lens and with the Canon 70-200mm f/4L and with a Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS. At the same aperature, the f/4L has slightly less CA than the Sigma. The sharpness is pretty much the same. The canon f/2.8 is slightly sharper and has IS. The IS does come in handy, but I have learned to carry my monopod around, so to me this becomes a non-issue. Also if you can shoot at greater than 1/focal length, then camera shake is not an issue. Its got a great build quality and looks good too. The HSM is maybe a slight hair slower than USM, so I'd say its good enough for anyone. Final verdict: Save some money and go with this, and get another lens with your ... I really enjoy this lens. Great bokeh, and decent at limiting the amount of CA. I've compared imagages shot with this lens and with the Canon 70-200mm f/4L and with a Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS. At the same aperature, the f/4L has slightly less CA than the Sigma. The sharpness is pretty much the same. The canon f/2.8 is slightly sharper and has IS. The IS does come in handy, but I have learned to carry my monopod around, so to me this becomes a non-issue. Also if you can shoot at greater than 1/focal length, then camera shake is not an issue. Its got a great build quality and looks good too. The HSM is maybe a slight hair slower than USM, so I'd say its good enough for anyone. Final verdict: Save some money and go with this, and get another lens with your savings! If you liked my review, please click on the YES button below. TIA!
par dallasfire1974
janv. 11, 2011
High Quality with a not so high price tag
I have been shooting with Sigma lenses for several years now. I purchased a Sigma 70-200 f2.8 a few years ago and enjoyed it greatly. I came to the conclusion that I simply didn't have much use for the thing and I sold it. Stupid move, believe me! This lens is rock solid. I missed it so much I had to get another one. Recently Sigma has released a 70-200 f2.8 with image stabilization. I get that, but I don't get why it costs twice as much as the one without it. I played with their new release lens (with IS) and simply cannot justify the extra cost. However, I am reviewing the previous model, aren't I? Constructed solidly and built with an internal focus/zoom feature, you simply cannot ask for a better workhorse lens than this one. I know full well about all the scientific reviews ... I have been shooting with Sigma lenses for several years now. I purchased a Sigma 70-200 f2.8 a few years ago and enjoyed it greatly. I came to the conclusion that I simply didn't have much use for the thing and I sold it. Stupid move, believe me! This lens is rock solid. I missed it so much I had to get another one. Recently Sigma has released a 70-200 f2.8 with image stabilization. I get that, but I don't get why it costs twice as much as the one without it. I played with their new release lens (with IS) and simply cannot justify the extra cost. However, I am reviewing the previous model, aren't I? Constructed solidly and built with an internal focus/zoom feature, you simply cannot ask for a better workhorse lens than this one. I know full well about all the scientific reviews that look at chromatic aberration, vignetting at different focal lengths and the like, but in truth, who really cares? When you put this thing on the end of your camera and starting really taking serious interest in making a quality shot, you simply cannot go wrong with this lens. Having a constant aperture of 2.8 is definitely my selling point. I learned a long time ago not to sacrifice on glass. Cameras come and go. Let's face it, their just like computers these days. But glass, good glass, that's the kind of stuff you hang on to, especially a 70-200 gun like the Sigma here. Way to go Sigma! I'm impressed!
par steveafawcett
juin 11, 2018
Great lens, solid build quality
Awesome addition to our 70D camera. Bought for child sports and wildlife photography, so far only used for swim meets and the picture quality is better overall compared to the Sigma 18-250 we have been using (which itself is really good). Solidly built, smooth adjusting, near silent and fast auto focusing. The image stabilization works like a charm, though it can slow down action shooting ever so slightly. It is hefty, but did find that holding under the tripod adapter really stabilizes it. Buying after a fair amount of research, it has more than met expectations. Awesome addition to our 70D camera. Bought for child sports and wildlife photography, so far only used for swim meets and the picture quality is better overall compared to the Sigma 18-250 we have been using (which itself is really good). Solidly built, smooth adjusting, near silent and fast auto focusing. The image stabilization works like a charm, though it can slow down action shooting ever so slightly. It is hefty, but did find that holding under the tripod adapter really stabilizes it. Buying after a fair amount of research, it has more than met expectations.
Achat vérifié : OuiÉtat : OccasionVendu par : 2pennyproductions