À propos
Toutes les évaluations (90)
- *****- Évaluation laissée par l'acheteur.Dernier moisAchat vérifiéThanks for being a wonderful customer! Please shop here again~
- newman151blue (6867)- Évaluation laissée par l'acheteur.Il y a plus d'un anAchat vérifiéHope to deal with you again. Thank you.
- *****- Évaluation laissée par l'acheteur.Dernière annéeAchat vérifiéQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
- husbandnwifesellers (1795)- Évaluation laissée par l'acheteur.Il y a plus d'un anAchat vérifiéGreat buyer!! Fast and easy transaction. Highly recommend!
- pixiedusttreasure (3597)- Évaluation laissée par l'acheteur.Il y a plus d'un anAchat vérifiéGreat buyer, fast payment - thank you!
- thelovinghem (681)- Évaluation laissée par l'acheteur.Il y a plus d'un anAchat vérifiéA pleasure to do business with.
Avis (12)

27 janv. 2019
Didn't work
Didn't work. No visible problem, but totally non-functional.

18 août 2018
Don't use near water
I replaced 4 cord ends and wasn't able to push the rubber cable housing through to get tight with the plug on any of them. Each individual wire inside still has it's housing, but I'm sure water could get into the plug from the cord side.
I'm new to replacing cords, so take this with a grain of salt. Maybe all replacement cord ends have this kind of issue.

05 févr. 2017
Interesting, but poorly organized
I got this as a textbook for Human Behavior in the Social Environment social work class. The authors attempt to look critically at theories as objects of study in and of themselves. While this kind of critical thinking is great, the authors seem to encourage readers to judge theories. My classmates read this book and then wanted to ignore structural functionalism as too conservative, and argued that since it didn't have a concept of oppression, it was useless in examining racism. This is a shame, because structural functionalism is powerful for explaining the reason all aspects of society are the way they are. This is essential background if we are ever to change these features of society.
Also, calling ecofeminism and deep ecology "systems theories" doesn't make any sense to me. The attempts to lump theories into categories is contrived. There's plenty of interesting ideas to consider in this book, but the book itself is poorly organized.
