L'objet de cette annonce a été vendu le dim. 29 juin à 13:35.
The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCull
Vendu
The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCull
8,26 $US8,26 $US
dim., juin 29, 01:35 PMdim., juin 29, 01:35 PM
Vous en avez un à vendre?

The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCull

8,26 $US
Environ11,35 $C
État :
Très bon
Hardcover book with dustjacket. Light wear to dust jacket and to pages.
    Expédition :
    Sans frais Economy Shipping.
    Lieu : Georgetown, Colorado, États-Unis
    Livraison :
    Livraison prévue entre le mar. 12 août et le sam. 16 août à 94104
    Le délai de livraison est estimé en utilisant notre méthode exclusive, basée sur la proximité de l'acheteur du lieu où se trouve l'objet, le service d'expédition sélectionné, l'historique d'expédition du vendeur et d'autres facteurs. Les délais de livraison peuvent varier, particulièrement lors de périodes achalandées.
    Renvois :
    Renvoi sous 30 jours. L'acheteur paie les frais de renvoi. Si vous utilisez une étiquette d'envoi eBay, son coût sera déduit du montant de votre remboursement.
    Paiements :
         Diners Club

    Magasinez en toute confiance

    Garantie de remboursement eBay
    Le vendeur assume l'entière responsabilité de cette annonce.
    Numéro de l'objet eBay :186860497013
    Dernière mise à jour : juin 18, 2025 20:04:34 HAEAfficher toutes les modificationsAfficher toutes les modifications

    Caractéristiques de l'objet

    État
    Très bon
    Un livre qui n’a pas l’air neuf et qui a été lu, mais qui est en excellent état. La couverture ne présente aucun dommage apparent et la jaquette (si applicable) est incluse (dans le cas des livres à reliure). Il n'y a aucune page manquante ou endommagée, aucun pli, aucune déchirure, aucun passage surligné ou souligné et aucune inscription en marge. Il est possible que le contreplat porte d'infimes marques d'identification. Le livre présente des traces d'usure infimes. Afficher toutes les définitions d'état(s'ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre ou un nouvel onglet)
    Remarques du vendeur
    “Hardcover book with dustjacket. Light wear to dust jacket and to pages.”
    ISBN
    9780190699482

    À propos de ce produit

    Product Identifiers

    Publisher
    Oxford University Press, Incorporated
    ISBN-10
    0190699485
    ISBN-13
    9780190699482
    eBay Product ID (ePID)
    25038249639

    Product Key Features

    Number of Pages
    344 Pages
    Language
    English
    Publication Name
    Spirit of the Constitution : John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of Mcculloch V. Maryland
    Subject
    Constitutional, Government / General, Lawyers & Judges, United States / General
    Publication Year
    2019
    Type
    Textbook
    Subject Area
    Law, Biography & Autobiography, History
    Author
    David S. Schwartz
    Format
    Hardcover

    Dimensions

    Item Height
    1.3 in
    Item Weight
    21.6 Oz
    Item Length
    6.1 in
    Item Width
    9.3 in

    Additional Product Features

    Intended Audience
    Scholarly & Professional
    LCCN
    2019-004959
    Reviews
    "David Schwartz has written an indispensable study of the single most important Supreme Court case in the canon. As such, he delineates not only the meaning and importance of the case in 1819, but also the use made of it over the next two centuries as it became a central myth and symbol of the very meaning of American constitutionalism."--Sanford Levinson, author of Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance"With compelling clarity, David Schwartz uses the many re-interpretations of McCulloch v. Maryland to illuminate the whole arc of American constitutional development, and draws a surprising but vital conclusion: it is wiser to look to the precedents set by elected legislative and executive officials, as well as our current needs, to decide what our constitutional system requires to fulfill its great goals-rather than asking 'what would John Marshall do?'"--Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania and President, American Political Science Association, 2018-2019"Professor Schwartz brilliantly shows that courts and scholars have gotten Chief Justice Marshall's famous opinion in McCulloch v Maryland wrong and misunderstood its role in the Court's history. This remarkable work of history is a must-read for anyone interested in constitutional law because Schwartz's findings should have profound consequences for Supreme Court decisionmaking in areas ranging from health care to federalism to civil rights. This is a major contribution."--William M. Treanor, Paul Dean Professor and Dean and Executive Vice President, Georgetown University Law Center"Professor Schwartz's book challenges the thinking of those who believe that the towering Marshall Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland stands for legal principles that are clear and specific. It carefully explores the ambiguities in the Court's opinion and, in the process, illuminates some of the most fundamental problems-too often slighted or denied-of American constitutionalism. It is particularly valuable in its convincing demonstration of the impact that slavery had on the development of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, especially when that influence was not immediately apparent in the cases and often neither acknowledged nor recognized by the formal law."--Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School, "David Schwartz has written an indispensable study of the single most important Supreme Court case in the canon. As such, he delineates not only the meaning and importance of the case in 1819, but also the use made of it over the next two centuries as it became a central myth and symbol of the very meaning of American constitutionalism."--Sanford Levinson, author of Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance "With compelling clarity, David Schwartz uses the many re-interpretations of McCulloch v. Maryland to illuminate the whole arc of American constitutional development, and draws a surprising but vital conclusion: it is wiser to look to the precedents set by elected legislative and executive officials, as well as our current needs, to decide what our constitutional system requires to fulfill its great goals-rather than asking 'what would John Marshall do?'"--Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania and President, American Political Science Association, 2018-2019 "Professor Schwartz brilliantly shows that courts and scholars have gotten Chief Justice Marshall's famous opinion in McCulloch v Maryland wrong and misunderstood its role in the Court's history. This remarkable work of history is a must-read for anyone interested in constitutional law because Schwartz's findings should have profound consequences for Supreme Court decisionmaking in areas ranging from health care to federalism to civil rights. This is a major contribution."--William M. Treanor, Paul Dean Professor and Dean and Executive Vice President, Georgetown University Law Center "Professor Schwartz's book challenges the thinking of those who believe that the towering Marshall Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland stands for legal principles that are clear and specific. It carefully explores the ambiguities in the Court's opinion and, in the process, illuminates some of the most fundamental problems-too often slighted or denied-of American constitutionalism. It is particularly valuable in its convincing demonstration of the impact that slavery had on the development of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, especially when that influence was not immediately apparent in the cases and often neither acknowledged nor recognized by the formal law."--Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School, "With compelling clarity, David Schwartz uses the many re-interpretations of McCulloch v. Maryland to illuminate the whole arc of American constitutional development, and draws a surprising but vital conclusion: it is wiser to look to the precedents set by elected legislative and executive officials, as well as our current needs, to decide what our constitutional system requires to fulfill its great goals-rather than asking 'what would John Marshall do?'"--Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania and President, American Political Science Association, 2018-2019 "David Schwartz has written an indispensable study of the single most important Supreme Court case in the canon. As such, he delineates not only the meaning and importance of the case in 1819, but also the use made of it over the next two centuries as it became a central myth and symbol of the very meaning of American constitutionalism."--Sanford Levinson, author of Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance "Professor Schwartz's book challenges the thinking of those who believe that the towering Marshall Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland stands for legal principles that are clear and specific. It carefully explores the ambiguities in the Court's opinion and, in the process, illuminates some of the most fundamental problems-too often slighted or denied-of American constitutionalism. It is particularly valuable in its convincing demonstration of the impact that slavery had on the development of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, especially when that influence was not immediately apparent in the cases and often neither acknowledged nor recognized by the formal law."--Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School, "David Schwartz has written an indispensable study of the single most important Supreme Court case in the canon. As such, he delineates not only the meaning and importance of the case in 1819, but also the use made of it over the next two centuries as it became a central myth and symbol of the very meaning of American constitutionalism."--Sanford Levinson, author of Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance"With compelling clarity, David Schwartz uses the many re-interpretations of McCulloch v. Maryland to illuminate the whole arc of American constitutional development, and draws a surprising but vital conclusion: it is wiser to look to the precedents set by elected legislative and executive officials, as well as our current needs, to decide what our constitutional system requires to fulfill its great goals-rather than asking 'what would John Marshalldo?'"--Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania and President, American Political Science Association, 2018-2019"Professor Schwartz brilliantly shows that courts and scholars have gotten Chief Justice Marshall's famous opinion in McCulloch v Maryland wrong and misunderstood its role in the Court's history. This remarkable work of history is a must-read for anyone interested in constitutional law because Schwartz's findings should have profound consequences for Supreme Court decisionmaking in areas ranging from health care to federalism to civil rights. This is amajor contribution."--William M. Treanor, Paul Dean Professor and Dean and Executive Vice President, Georgetown University Law Center"Professor Schwartz's book challenges the thinking of those who believe that the towering Marshall Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland stands for legal principles that are clear and specific. It carefully explores the ambiguities in the Court's opinion and, in the process, illuminates some of the most fundamental problems-too often slighted or denied-of American constitutionalism. It is particularly valuable in its convincing demonstration of theimpact that slavery had on the development of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, especially when that influence was not immediately apparent in the cases and often neither acknowledged nor recognized by the formallaw."--Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School
    TitleLeading
    The
    Dewey Edition
    23
    Illustrated
    Yes
    Dewey Decimal
    342.73052
    Table Of Content
    Introduction: "The Letter and Spirit of the Constitution"Part I: Defensive NationalismChapter 1: "The Case Now to be Determined": the Elusive Meaning of McCulloch v. MarylandChapter 2: "A Question Perpetually Arising": Constitutional Politics and Law, circa 1819Chapter 3: "Has Congress Power to Incorporate a Bank?": the McCulloch Oral Argument and OpinionChapter 4: "As Far as Human Prudence Could Insure": The Retreat from Implied PowersPart II: Disappearance and RevivalChapter 5: "The Baneful Influence of this Narrow Construction": McCulloch in the Age of Jackson, 1832-1860Chapter 6: "The Various Crises of Human Affairs": McCulloch and the Civil War Chapter 7: "The Government of All": the Rise and Fall of Reconstruction, 1865-1883 Chapter 8: "Acting Directly on the People": Neo-Whig Nationalism, 1868-1888 Chapter 9: "The Painful Duty of this Tribunal": The Emergence of Judicial Supremacy, 1884-1901 Part III: The Canonical CaseChapter 10: "Some Choice of Means": The Lochner Era and ProgressivismChapter 11: "Withholding the Most Appropriate Means": The New Deal and Judicial Crisis, 1932-1936Chapter 12: "It is a Constitution We Are Expounding": the Triumph of the Capable Constitution, 1937-1968Chapter 13: "A Splendid Bauble": McCulloch in the Long Conservative Court, 1969-2018Conclusion: "As Long as Our System Shall Exist"
    Synopsis
    2019 marks the 200th anniversary of one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in American history: McCulloch v. Maryland . The state of Maryland tried to impede the establishment of the Bank of the United States, but Chief Justice John Marshall decided that the Necessary and Proper clause of the Constitution gave the federal government implied powers that allowed it to charter the bank without hindrance. The decision expanded the power of the national government vis- -vis the states, and it still figures centrally in contemporary debates about the scope of national legislative power. Indeed, Chief Justice Roberts' 2012 decision upholding the Affordable Care Act relied on it. In The Spirit of the Constitution , David S. Schwartz tells the story of the decision's long-term impact and the evolution of Justice Marshall's reputation. By tracing the rich history of McCulloch 's influence from 1819 to the present, he shows that its meaning-and significance-for judges, political leaders, and the public varied greatly over time. The case was alternately celebrated, denounced, ignored, and reinterpreted to suit the needs of the moment. While Marshall was never reviled, he was not seen as especially influential until the late nineteenth century. Competing parties utilized McCulloch in constitutional debates over national power in the early republic; over the question of slavery in the late antebellum period; and over Congress's role in regulating the economy and civil rights in the twentieth century. Even after McCulloch 's meaning seemed fixed by the mid-twentieth century, new debates about its implications have emerged in recent times. Schwartz's analysis of McCulloch 's remarkable impact reaffirms the case's importance and unveils the circuitous process through which American constitutional law and ideology are made., The Spirit of the Constitution covers the impact and reputation of both McCulloch and Justice Marshall himself throughout American history. One of the central threads of American history is the battle over the proper reach of the federal government's power, and that story cannot be told without reference to McCulloch. Schwartz's analysis of the shifting interpretations of McCulloch and Marshall over the course of American history not only reaffirms the case's importance, it also helps us understand the circuitous process by which American constitutional law and ideology are made., 2019 marks the 200th anniversary of one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in American history: McCulloch v. Maryland. The state of Maryland tried to impede the establishment of the Bank of the United States, but Chief Justice John Marshall decided that the Necessary and Proper clause of the Constitution gave the federal government implied powers that allowed it to charter the bank without hindrance. The decision expanded the power of the national government vis-à-vis the states, and it still figures in contemporary debates about the scope of national legislative power. Indeed, Chief Justice Roberts' 2012 decision upholding the Affordable Care Act relied on it.In The Spirit of the Constitution, David S. Schwartz tells the story of the decision's long-term impact and the evolution of Justice Marshall's reputation. By tracing the rich history of McCulloch's influence from 1819 to the present, he shows that its meaning and significance for judges, political leaders, and the public varied greatly over time. The case was alternately celebrated, denounced, ignored, and reinterpreted to suit the needs of the moment. While Marshall was never reviled, he was not seen as especially influential until the late nineteenth century. Competing parties utilized McCulloch in constitutional debates over national power in the early republic; over the question of slavery in the late antebellum period; and over Congress's role in regulating the economy and civil rights in the twentieth century. Even after McCulloch's meaning seemed fixed by the mid-twentieth century, new debates about its implications have emerged in recent times. Schwartz's analysis of McCulloch's remarkable impact reaffirms the case's importance and unveils the circuitous process through which American constitutional law and ideology are made., 2019 marks the 200th anniversary of one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in American history: McCulloch v. Maryland . The state of Maryland tried to impede the establishment of the Bank of the United States, but Chief Justice John Marshall decided that the Necessary and Proper clause of the Constitution gave the federal government implied powers that allowed it to charter the bank without hindrance. The decision expanded the power of the national government vis-à-vis the states, and it still figures centrally in contemporary debates about the scope of national legislative power. Indeed, Chief Justice Roberts' 2012 decision upholding the Affordable Care Act relied on it. In The Spirit of the Constitution , David S. Schwartz tells the story of the decision's long-term impact and the evolution of Justice Marshall's reputation. By tracing the rich history of McCulloch 's influence from 1819 to the present, he shows that its meaning-and significance-for judges, political leaders, and the public varied greatly over time. The case was alternately celebrated, denounced, ignored, and reinterpreted to suit the needs of the moment. While Marshall was never reviled, he was not seen as especially influential until the late nineteenth century. Competing parties utilized McCulloch in constitutional debates over national power in the early republic; over the question of slavery in the late antebellum period; and over Congress's role in regulating the economy and civil rights in the twentieth century. Even after McCulloch 's meaning seemed fixed by the mid-twentieth century, new debates about its implications have emerged in recent times. Schwartz's analysis of McCulloch 's remarkable impact reaffirms the case's importance and unveils the circuitous process through which American constitutional law and ideology are made.
    LC Classification Number
    KF4565.S39 2019

    Description de l'objet du vendeur

    À propos de ce vendeur

    Snowrider Books

    98,9% d'évaluations positives24K objets vendus

    Membre depuis : mai 2007
    Visiter la BoutiqueContacter

    Évaluations détaillées du vendeur

    Moyenne au cours des 12 derniers mois
    Qualité de la description
    4.9
    Justesse des frais d'expédition
    5.0
    Rapidité de l'expédition
    5.0
    Communication
    4.9

    Évaluations comme vendeur (7 156)

    Toutes les évaluations
    Positives
    Neutres
    Négatives
      • s***a (771)- Évaluation laissée par l'acheteur.
        Dernier mois
        Achat vérifié
        Good
      Afficher toutes les évaluations